|
Dragonchoice
- Necessity or Destiny?
"'Kitti Ping kept as much natural instinct as possible'"
(Dragonsdawn, p 353)
Fire-lizards display few scruples when it comes to bonding
with humans. If food is offered and compassion demonstrated,
virtually anyone may Impress a fire-lizard of any colour.
From the outset, it was required that the Impression bond
between dragons and humans be many levels deeper than the
often superficial attachment of fire-lizards. In order to
be a useful, trainable force in the fight against Thread,
dragons' intelligence had to be enhanced beyond that of the
flighty, elemental and child-like natives. And the necessary
longevity of the bond meant that rider and dragon would benefit
from compatibility of character and purpose.
Kitti Ping - often described as traditional in mindset -
envisaged a scenario in which women would Impress only female
dragons, and men only the males. She achieved this end only
in part. What is certain is that her tinkering was directly
responsible for the like to like gender pairings that the
first dragons made with their riders, and this change from
the fire-lizard template is largely, though not entirely,
in evidence through canon.
But to what extent can we attribute the other criteria used
by a hatchling dragon in choosing his rider to the foresight
of one elderly woman? Kitti certainly made dragons more discerning
than fire-lizards, but it is much less likely that she purposely
or farsightedly programmed in every quirk and factor affecting
a dragon's choice of rider. It should be remembered that Kitti
Ping was neither a philosopher nor a sociologist. Her understanding
of biology and genetics was outstanding, but working in haste
and under enormous pressure to produce an answer to the threat
of Thread, she could not possibly have had the time or expertise
to consider every social and cultural possibility that might
result from the creation of her dragons.
Indeed, Bay remarks, "'Kitti Ping kept as much natural
instinct as possible,'" (Dragonsdawn, p 353),
and nowhere is this more evident than in the choices of green
dragonets. Kitti's tampering could have resulted in the deaths
of dozens of green hatchlings when female candidates became
scarce. But the same powerful will to live that can drive
fire-lizards to cannibalism overrode the greens' artificial
need for female riders: if girls were not available, green
hatchlings chose boys rather than die unImpressed. This inherited
pragmatism trumps Kitti's traditionalist programming, and
yet serves her ultimate purpose: the creation of an effective
and viable fighting force against Thread.
So a dragonet's pursuit of Impression is not easily thwarted,
but dragons certainly don't choose as arbitrarily as fire-lizards.
What, then, makes a hatchling choose one candidate over another?
Canon frequently tells us one thing and shows another. Anne's
science is often shaky at best, and the superstition and reverence
surrounding dragons makes for unreliable narration. But conclusions
can be drawn from the text, in what is said, what is implied,
and what is left unsaid. A dragonet's particular needs may
not be precisely quantifiable, but neither is the matter of
dragon choice a completely impenetrable mystery.
Back to Impress
or die | On to The bottom line
|